Martin Luther King and Henry DavidThoreau Essay

yet with different powers Dr. Martin Luther ability junior and heat content David Thoreau were some(prenominal) admirable men that strived for a better giving medication. As detected spokesmen they served as rebels against what they thought to be bad cardinals stopping at nothing. not even jail. henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King junior were both brilliant men. Thoreaus polished Obedience and Dr. Kings garner from Birmingham Jail are perfect examples of their intellect. expression at these documents and observing the tactics they habit while attempting to move their audience toward their cr confessing(prenominal) goal, one can see the cunning that both men possessed.Thoreau and Dr. King lived during devil different centuries. So being that they were utterer and activist on the current issues its almost certain that they would have a different motive. Even though their motive was poles a rack upt, differing in many way of lifes, both Thoreau and Dr. King wrot e with the aspiration of obtaining a parvenue form of government presumably resembling the republican one we exercise today. Although awfully controversial, to do so both men matte nonverbal actions such as severance the laws was the only effective way. In appal of the fact that its relatively ironic, they viewed leaving to jail in order to fabricate a mockery of an immoral or impractical laws put in military post by the government was the very highest respect for law (King para. 5).Henry David Thoreau motive for rebelling against the government was to make it more of a popular one.He had no respect for the way it was being ran. His proclaimed problem basically summed up to be that he felt up the government was being ran like a monarchy, or in other linguistic communication by a selective a couple of(prenominal) and not an entire society as it should. It simply wasnt up to par according to his standards for he stated this I ask for, not at at one time no government, but at in one case a better government (para. 4). inappropriate Henry David Thoreau, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an African American during the times of segregation. This alone is a circumstantial manipulating variable in the equation of wherefore the twos motive wasnt the same. Dr. King was all about parcel America move towards a desegregated future. He had zeal towards annihilating all unsporting laws which he stated to be a code inflicted upon a minority which that minority had no part in enacting or creating (para. 4), but for the most part he had an overall respect for the government.In conclusion, its safe to say that other than induce and motive Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. were pretty similar. They both were men of their own opinion that could be classified as moralized radicals. As spokesmen of their time they were both levelheaded at what they did. Through the form of speeches, protest, letters, and etcetera they both exemplified Civil Disobedience (Thoreau).Thoreau, Henry D. Civil Disobedience. New York Barnes & Noble Books, 1849. 263-287.King Jr., Dr. Martin L. Letter from Birmingham City Jail. 16 Apr.-May 1963. Birmingham Charles Moore, 1963. 1.