The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Essay

The Ideas in Sandra Cisneross Only Daughter and Deborah Tannens Sex, Lies, and Conversation - Essay ExampleThe design of sexual urge plays different roles within Cisneross and Tannens contributions. Cisneros makes a big deal that she was the only daughter of a family of seven children. She desperately cherished to have her father be proud of what she did make-up. I wanted my father to understand what it was I was scribbling, to figure me as My only daughter, the writer. Not as This is only my daughter. She teaches. Es maestra teacher. Not even profesora. The structure of Cisneross story is short and to the point. The purpose of the sample is to show how Cisneross professional develop workforcet progressed from being essentially an unknown writer to, ten years later, having had a lot of success as a writer. The purpose of gender in Tannens essay is to show the difference in communication patterns between men and women. The communication problems that endanger marriage cant be fixed by mechanical engineering. They require a tonic conceptual framework about the role of talk in human relationships. Essentially, Tannen is saying we need to be able to rework the role of conversation between men and women. The structure of the essay begins by Tannen grievous a story about how women talk less in public than in men. The purpose of the essay was to draw attention to why this mix-up in communications causes divorces. The explanation for the purpose of gender in these two essays is completely different betwixt the twoand the opposite sex (men) is mentioned in Cisneross piece but not nearly as much as in Tannens. The structure of the essays were different in that Cisneross piece was short and Tannens long. Both essays had a common purpose, however, which was to see the value in womens contributions. III. The Outcomes From the Two Stories ? The outcome from Sandra Cisneross story was her professional development. Last year, after ten years of writing professionall y, the financial rewards started to trickle in. My second National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship. A guest professorship at the University of California, Berkeley. My book, which sold to a major New York publishing house.3 The outcome for Tannen was talking about what circumscribe women to complicateher conversation. For women, as for girls, intimacy is the fabric of relationships, and talk is the thread from which it is woven.4 The explanation that draws a run in the sand between these two different pieces is that Sandra Cisneros is talking about how she, as a writer, overcame her struggles in order to become a writer and to ultimately make her father proudwhich was the sole superlative achievement that Cisneros found?worthwhile to achieve. The main attraction of Tannens article is that she is talking about how gender differences severely impair relationships and lead to divorce. In terms of theme, the outcomes from these two storied essays are vastly different. In fact, Tann ens assertion at the end of her piece that people who cannot work things out should just get divorced, makes all of her prior assertions about relationships seem invalidbecause she is advocating divorce. This proves that she doesnt really value the male-female relationship adequate to want to preserve it